WHITES ARE 22 TIMES WEALTHIER THAN BLACKS….DAMN!!!!


White Americans have 22 times more wealth than blacks — a gap that nearly doubled during the Great Recession.

The median household net worth for whites was $110,729 in 2010, versus $4,995 for blacks, according to recently released Census Bureau figures.

The difference is similarly notable when it comes to Hispanics, who had a median household net worth of $7,424. The ratio between white and Hispanic wealth expanded to 15 to 1.

The gap between the races widened considerably during the recent economic downturn, which whites weathered better than blacks, Hispanics and Asians.

The latter three groups saw their median household net worth fall by roughly 60% between 2005 and 2010, while the median net worth for white households slipped only 23%.

This allowed whites to leap ahead of Asians as the race with the highest median household net worth.

CNN iReport: Are you feeling the drop in net worth?

The racial wealth divide is nothing new. Black and Hispanic Americans have historically had lower incomes, higher unemployment and less education.

That makes it more difficult for these groups to save money and put their capital to work building wealth, said Tatjana Meschede, research director of the Institute on Assets and Social Policy at Brandeis University.

The Great Recession exacerbated the problem. In 2005, the net worth difference wasn’t quite as stark. Whites had 12 times more wealth than blacks and 8 times more than Hispanics.

The main reason blacks and Hispanics did not fare as well during the economic downturn is that home equity makes up more of their wealth than it does for whites. The housing bubble that preceded the collapse pushed up homeownership rates among blacks and Hispanics, who relied more heavily on high-cost subprime loans to finance their purchases.

As a result, the implosion of the real estate market had a more devastating impact on black and Hispanic communities.

Asians, meanwhile, are more concentrated on the West Coast, which was hit harder by the mortgage meltdown. And the arrival of new Asian immigrants in the last decade contributed to the decline in overall wealth, according to Rakesh Kochhar, co-author of the Pew Research Center report on wealth.

Pew found that in 2005, home equity made up nearly two-thirds of the net worth of Hispanics and 59% of blacks, but only 44% of whites.

Blacks and Hispanics are also less likely to have assets in the financial system, such as savings accounts or stocks, Kochhar said.

And these groups also suffer from far higher unemployment rates than whites, whose unemployment rate is 7.4%, below the national average. Blacks, on the other hand, have a 13.6% unemployment rate and Hispanics, 11%.

Posted by Ngo Okafor

The most downloaded black male model

Nigerian American black male model photo gallery and blog

www.getingo.com

HOW RICH, MILLIONAIRE ATHLETES SPEND THEIR MONEY AND GO BANKRUPT

Professional Athlete Bankrupt. You’ve seen the headline before. It’s a  narrative that no longer surprises even the most casual sports fan. High profile  examples are everywhere. Antoine Walker earned $110 million and lost it all. Vin  Baker managed to burn through the $93 million teams paid him during an All-Star  career. Mark Brunell made $50 million over the course of his NFL career and is  now $25 million in debt.

Those are the big stories, the ones that find their way onto SportsCenter and  into newspapers, but the tale repeats itself over and over again in smaller  installments. Somewhere between 60% and 80% of athletes in the NBA and NFL go  bankrupt within five years of retirement, despite making an average of $5.15 million and $1.9 million per season, respectively.

So where do the millions go? For answers, we asked Chris Gandy and Doug  Glanville for some insight. Gandy, a former University of Illinois basketball  star who played for the Chicago Bulls and L’Hermaine in France, is currently a  district sales manager at Mass Mutual where he advises 29 current professional  athletes. (As an undergrad, he also once set this vicious pick on Duke’s Steve Wojciechowski.)  Glanville, who had a nine-year baseball career after graduating from the  University of Pennsylvania with a degree in systems engineering, is a  businessman and writes op-eds for outlets such as The New York Times that focus  on the lives of professional athletes.

Below, you’ll find a breakdown of how a $5 million salary is spent, followed  by observations from Gandy and Glanville. These numbers are estimates, but  provide a general guideline.

The takeaway: The spending adds up quickly, and it’s not entirely the  athlete’s fault.

Gandy and Glanville cite three factors that combine to drive up costs: an  athlete’s desire to live similar lifestyle as his peers; a priority on ease, and  quickness of service rather than cost; and the perception that there is always  another massive check coming.

Part of the expense comes from the unique realities of an athlete’s life. For  someone with a contract worth millions of dollars, the priority is ease rather  than price. That luxury is expensive.

“Services cost more for these guys, mostly because no one has time to compare  and contrast anything. It is all about speed and convenience,” Glanville says.  “It’s not just because you’re showing off. You are so busy with the game.  [During a baseball season], you have 162 games. You’re not paying attention to  anything other than playing. I had one day when six or seven paychecks went into  my back account and I didn’t even look.”

Agents, who are limited by the CBA in the fees they can charge (5%-7%,  depending on the league), often make another 5%-10% of their client’s contract  through “management fees.” (If the agent doesn’t, another advisor does.) The  players, who are busy focusing on day-to-day duties of being a pro athlete, are  happy to sign on so their bills are paid, their clothes are laundered, and the  rest of their non-athletic lives are handled. Another 5% doesn’t seem like much  when the checks are rolling in every two weeks.

“They are giving away so much money,” Gandy says. “In 10 years, you ask them  if they’d give someone $250,000 to balance their checkbook, they’d say no. But  when they are playing, sure they would.”

Friends and family add to the tab. Antoine Walker reportedly had a crew of  30-70 people on his payroll. Most pros won’t ever spend that much, but $1,000 a  month a piece for a couple friends, $1,500 a month for your brother, and a  $50,000 for the mortgage on your mother’s house adds up quickly.

Athletes do have more control over their investments, but they’re seen as  easy marks and are constantly being pitched products, clubs, restaurants, and  other ideas. The people pitching want a player’s money. Players rarely have the  time or the inclination to do their due diligence—and a life of success in the  field or on the court often breeds an attitude that makes them believe they can  succeed in business.

“You’re a gambler by nature. And everybody and their dog has been pitching  you since you signed that first contract. Eventually, something is going to  sound pretty good,” Glanville says. “That competitive nature is hard to turn  off.”

In Gandy’s experience, one in four athletes make a “horrible, horrible  investment that no one else would make.” For example, Torii Hunter sank $70,000  into a raft designed to sit under furniture that could be inflated during a  flood. The investor asked him for $500,000 more, but the centerfielder declined.  Hunter never saw his cash again.

Athletes are also forced to double up on large expenses. When Glanville was  playing, he owned a house near Philadelphia—he bought another one in Dallas  after he signed with the Texas Rangers. He also rented a place every year in  Arizona during spring training and routinely shipped his car across the country.

Spending money, in other words, comes with the territory of being a  professional athlete—being fiscally responsible is, in some ways, antithetical  to athletic success. As long as a player continues to perform, the money will  keep coming. When he no longer can, however, the spigot’s turned off. Thinking  about saving money for the future can mean an athlete is allowing doubt about  his abilities creep into his mind. For someone who needs to perform everyday, in  public, that can be a dangerous proposition.

From GQ.com

Posted by

Ngo Okafor

The most downloaded black male model

Nigerian Americab black male model photo gallery and blog

www.getingo.com

 

BILL CLINTON IS “VERY SORRY” OVER OBAMA TAX CUT COMMENTS

Loose lips threaten to sink the democratic ship!! This is what happens when people go on TV and talk without thinking the points through. Republicans have jumped on Bill Clinton’s comments over President Obama’s tax cuts, to Wolf Blitzer,  and are using them as ammunition against President Barack Obama. Think…Think…Think… before you speak.

Read more….

Bill Clinton regrets the swirl over comments he made earlier in the week in which he appeared to suggest he would be open to extending the so-called Bush tax cuts for the wealthy, the former president said Thursday.

“I’m very sorry about what happened,” Clinton said in an interview to air on CNN’s “The Situation Room with Wolf Blitzer.” “I thought something had to be done on the ‘fiscal cliff’ before the election. Apparently nothing has to be done until the first of the year.”

Republicans seized on Clinton’s remarks this week when he said lawmakers will likely put off a series of major spending and budget decisions. They argued the former president was siding with many in the GOP who call for the extension of the controversial tax cuts largely opposed by Democrats.

“[Congress] will probably have to put everything off until early next year,” Clinton said Tuesday during an interview with CNBC. “That’s probably the best thing to do right now.”

The “fiscal cliff” consists of measures set to begin in January that would remove more than $500 billion out of the economy in 2013 alone. Those measures include the expiration of the Bush tax cuts and protection of the middle class from the Alternative Minimum Tax, the onset of $1 trillion in blunt spending cuts, and a reduction in Medicare doctors’ pay.

On Thursday, however, Clinton argued that he, in fact, supported President Barack Obama’s position, which calls for an end to the tax cuts only for those making $250,000 or more.

The former president emphasized he was mistaken about the timing of the fiscal cliff when he made his comments, thinking it would happen before the November election, rather than at the beginning of next year.

“I really was under the impression that they would have to do something before the election, and I was trying to figure out how they would kick it to last (through) the election,” he said.

He continued: “Once I realized that nothing had to be done until the first of the year, I supported (Obama’s) position. I supported extending them last year, but I think his position is the right one and necessary for working out a comprehensive (deficit reduction) deal.”

The comments marked the second time Republicans pounced on Clinton in a week, trying to use his own words against Obama.

The former president last week complimented Mitt Romney’s private equity career in an interview on CNN’s “Piers Morgan Tonight,” which raised eyebrows among Democrats who have been using Romney’s corporate history as an attack against the presumptive GOP presidential nominee.

Last week, Clinton described Romney as a successful businessman and nodded to his “sterling” career.

Clarifying his remarks Thursday, Clinton said that just because he thinks Romney did well in the private sector doesn’t mean he deserves to be elected president.

“You can be successful in business…if your shareholders do well,” he said. “You can only be successful as president if the shareholders, the employees, the customers, and the communities do well–all of the constituencies of American market economics.”

While Clinton has attended several top fundraisers for Obama this cycle, some critics argue Clinton’s recent slip-ups are attempts to undermine the current president. Asked about his relationship with Obama, Clinton did not directly comment on his personal views of the president but pointed to his record of campaigning for him, instead.

“Look in 2008, when he ran for president and defeated Hillary in the primaries, I did 40 events for him. 40 in the election,” he said.

He then said he repeatedly argues the president has “done a good job, a really good job under very trying circumstances” and stressed that he is “strongly committed” to Obama’s re-election.

Thursday’s interview came the same day a new CNN/ORC International poll indicated 66% of Americans hold a favorable view of Clinton, while 31% give him an unfavorable rating.

The former two-term Democratic president’s favorable rating bottomed out in CNN polling at 51% in June of 2008, after Clinton took a very active role in advocating for his wife in her historic battle with Obama for the Democratic presidential nomination.

From CNN.com

Posted by

Ngo Okafor

The most downloaded black male model

Nigerian American black male male model photo gallery and blog

www.getingo.com