WILL LANCE ARMSTRONG BE STRIPPED OF HIS TOUR DE FRANCE WINS?

His reputation already in tatters after a lifetime ban by the U.S. Anti-Doping Agency, Lance Armstrong finds out Monday whether he will be scrubbed from the record books for the seven feats that made him a cycling legend.

The International Cycling Union, the sport’s governing body, is set to rule on the agency’s recommendation that Armstrong be stripped of his seven Tour de France titles.

Armstrong’s story — that of a cancer survivor who tamed the grueling three-week race not once, not twice, but more than any other cyclist before or since — made him a household name.

Then came this month’s finding by the USADA of “overwhelming” evidence that he was involved as a professional cyclist in “the most sophisticated, professionalized and successful doping program.”

The agency then announced it would ban Armstrong from the sport for life and strip him of his results dating from 1998. The decision wiped out 14 years of his career.

The International Olympic Committee also is reviewing the evidence and could revoke Armstrong’s bronze medal from the 2000 Sydney Games.

Should the International Cycling Union concur with the USADA’s recommendation, it will be up to the organizers of the Tour de France whether it will nominate alternate winners for the 1999-2005 tours. The Amaury Sport Organisation, which runs the 21-day event, has said it will decide after the ruling.

If Armstrong’s name is expunged, it will leave Greg LeMond as the only American to win the tour. He did so in 1986, 1989, and 1990.

Armstrong, 41, has consistently denied the allegations.

In the past, Armstrong argued that he has taken more than 500 drug tests and never failed. In its 202-page report, the USADA said it had tested Armstrong less than 60 times and the UCI conducted about 215 tests. The international cycling agency goes by its French acronym.

“Thus the number of actual controls on Mr. Armstrong over the years appears to have been considerably fewer than the number claimed by Armstrong and his lawyers,” the USADA said.

The agency didn’t say that Armstrong ever failed one of those tests, only that his former teammates testified as to how they beat tests or avoided the test administrators altogether. Several riders also said team officials seemed to know when random drug tests were coming, the report said.

Speaking to participants in his cancer-fighting foundation’s annual Ride for the Roses in Austin, Texas, on Sunday, Armstrong said, “People ask me a lot how are you doing. And I tell them I’ve been better, but I’ve also been worse.”

In his brief remarks to the crowd, Armstrong didn’t mention the recent findings by the USADA.

He stepped down last week as chairman of the Lance Armstrong Foundation, but said he will continue to be involved. Some of the foundation’s donors are furious over the scandal, and want their money back.

“We will not be deterred,” Armstrong said Friday night at the organization’s 15th anniversary celebration in Austin, Texas. “We will move forward.”

The controversy also has taken its toll on Armstrong’s endorsement deals.

On the same day he stepped away from the leadership of his foundation, Nike, which initially stood by Armstrong, dropped him with a terse statement citing what it called “seemingly insurmountable evidence” that he participated in doping.

Hours later, brewery giant Anheuser-Busch followed suit, saying it would let Armstrong’s contract expire at the end of the year. Nike and Anheuser-Busch said they still planned to support Livestrong and its initiatives.

Professional cycling couldn’t escape the backlash either as Dutch bank Rabobank announced it is to end its sponsorship of pro cycling teams in the wake of the doping scandal.

From CNN.com

Posted by Ngo Okafor

The most downloaded black male model phoho gallery and blog

www.getingo.com

ONCE A CHEATER ALWAYS A CHEATER?

I found another interesting article for your saturday reading. This is always a point of discussion for men and women.  I’m a believer that all people can change. People can learn from their mistakes and do better the next time around. What are your thoughts on this issue? I pulled pieces of this article from cnn.com

Read More…..

It’s always possible that people who have cheated in the past will not cheat in the future. But relationship experts say past behavior is a better predictor of the future than any cheater’s promises.

“Denial can be really powerful in new relationships,” said divorce recovery expert Andra Brosh, co-founder of Divorce Detox in Santa Monica, California. “People use it as a defense against knowing the truth. They don’t look at all the facts, and ultimately, that ends up being a problem.”

Cheaters are usually unsatisfied about something in their lives, experts say, or they wouldn’t stray. But it’s not always clear whether they’re truly unhappy with their partners or about something they can’t fix in themselves. Rarely does the cheater take responsibility for his (or her) life and getting out of it honorably. The spouses generally get the blame.

The reputation of Elizabeth Edwards, who separated from John Edwards in 2010 after 32 years of marriage and died of cancer in 2010, seemed to be on trial at times. A full participant in her husband’s presidential campaign, she could be tough and blunt with campaign staffers. After reports surfaced of the affair, a witness testified, Elizabeth Edwards confronted her husband and ripped off her blouse to show her mastectomy scars. “You don’t see me anymore,” former staffer Christina Reynolds quoted her as saying.

“I’ve worked with countless people like this, and it’s always the same,” writes Mira Kirshenbaum, author of “I Love You But I Don’t Trust You,” a book about rebuilding trust in relationships, in an e-mail. “The cheater says, ‘My spouse is fat/stupid/mean/boring/whatever (insert adjective) and I need someone who is skinny/smart/nice/interesting/opposite-of-whatever. You are skinny/smart/nice/interesting/opposite-of-whatever. So we can be happy forever.’ ”

The cheater’s flattery can be intoxicating, convincing the other person that he or she is special and protected from being cheated on in the future. “They think they’re special because they’ve been told they’re special, and they want to believe it,” Kirshenbaum said. “It’s not that people don’t think. It’s that flattery and excitement short-circuit thought. ”

And an ABCNews.com report that a juror might have been flirting with Edwards drew a lot of attention. Edwards flirting? Quelle surprise.

Can cheaters change?

Of course, many cheaters can change if they have the desire. Much has been made of Callista Gingrich, who had an affair with Gingrich while he was married to his second wife, helping her husband convert to Catholicism. It’s possible that Gingrich may stay faithful, if for no other reason than the 24-news cycle means public figures are being constantly scrutinized for evidence of bad behavior.

Affairs with married men or women are a high-risk gamble, says Lawrence Josephs, an Adelphi University psychology professor. Look at the evidence: Cheating is how he or she has chosen to solve relationship problems. “When you win such a man, you are winning someone who feels entitled to have his cake and eat it too and then lie about it,” Josephs said.

So Callista Gingrich or any future Edwards girlfriend shouldn’t assume she can change the cheater or that he will be different with her because she’s so special. Their love, and his belief in God or occupancy of the White House, will not keep anyone faithful if he doesn’t want to be or can’t be faithful. (Former President Bill Clinton proved that point.)

Questions to ask

It is possible for people in decent marriages to fall in love outside the marriage, but it’s important to carefully assess whether the couple can get beyond the fantasy to the reality of love. “I would try to look carefully at the (cheater’s) motivation and see what you feel is genuinely true between the two of us,” said Susan Piver, author of “The Wisdom of a Broken Heart.” “Do you admire their character otherwise? Do you feel loved and seen as you are?”

There needs to be some recognition that your relationship isn’t a perfect replacement of an imperfect marriage.

“A question to ask yourself is, ‘Does my relationship include difficulty?’ ” Piver recommended. “Are there things that bug me about this person? If there aren’t, that would send up a red flag for me.”

If they seem only motivated by ambition or simply looking for brighter horizons, “delete them from your Facebook account and move on,” she says.

Posted by

Ngo Okafor

The most downloaded black male model

Nigerian American black male model photo gallery and blog

www.getingo.com