MITT ROMNEY: WHY AMERICA DOES NOT LIKE HIM

For the past few months, I have been trying to figure out why Mitt Romney is so unlikeable.

It can’t be because he’s rich, because there are a lot of rich people we like. Hell, President Obama’s rich and 56% of the country views him favorably.

It can’t be because he’s Republican, because Republicans don’t like him either. Last month, when a woman reportedly asked House Speaker John Boehner, “Can you make me love Mitt Romney?” he said, “No… the American people probably aren’t going to fall in love with Mitt Romney.”

The latest CNN/ORC International Poll found that 48% of Americans view him unfavorably, which isn’t exactly breaking news because Romney’s been unable to get much likeability traction since announcing his first run at the White House five years ago. For a sex scandal-free politician, that’s got to be a bit perplexing.

But then last week, the reason for the bad vibes about Romney became clear. You see, he’s been zipping across the country using President Obama’s “You didn’t build that” quote out of context for an analogy about a student who worked hard in school and made the honor roll. He used it again when he introduced his running mate, Paul Ryan last weekend.

What the president said was:

“If you were successful, somebody along the line gave you some help. There was a great teacher somewhere in your life. Somebody helped to create this unbelievable American system that we have that allowed you to thrive. Somebody invested in roads and bridges. If you’ve got a business — you didn’t build that.” He also said, “The point is, is that when we succeed, we succeed because of our individual initiative, but also because we do things together.”

Romney spins it to make it sound as if the president is totally discrediting an individual’s hard work, summing it up this way.

“I realize that he got to school on a bus and the bus driver got him there, but I don’t give the bus driver credit for the honor roll,” he said. “I give the kid credit for the honor roll.”

Nothing’s wrong with that statement by itself.

The problem is, we don’t live by ourselves.

This analogy epitomizes what makes Romney so unlikeable to so many people, regardless of party, race, gender or socioeconomic status.

In his mind, the world is full of bus drivers and honor roll students and the two are independent of each other, which is why he can characterize President Obama’s desire to help those less fortunate as creating a “culture of dependence.” What rubs so many people the wrong way is Romney’s inability to see that society is interdependent.

There are moments in some of Romney’s speeches in which he comes across like the guy who doesn’t wave when you let him into traffic, because in his mind, he was able to merge on his own.

Few people ever like that guy … and this is why less than 50% of Americans like Romney.

From CNN

MICHAEL PHELPS LEADS US GOLD RUSH WITH HISTORIC 17TH MEDAL

Michael Phelps added to his Olympic legend Friday night, winning the 100-meter butterfly to capture his third gold medal of the London Games and the 17th of his career.

Already the most decorated Olympian in history, Phelps started off Friday’s race — which he has said will be his final individual Olympic race, having promised to retire after this competition — trailing several swimmers.

But with basketball great Lebron James and Prince William among those looking on, the Baltimore native charged ahead late to win by 0.23 seconds over South Africa’s Chad le Clos and Russia’s Evgeny Korotyshkin, who finished with an identical time.

That margin, while slim, was still exponentially larger than when Phelps captured gold in the same event at the 2008 Beijing Games. Phelps won that race by .01 seconds by taking a quick, final stroke to catch a Serbian swimmer gliding to the wall.

“This one was I guess a bigger margin than the last two, so a step in the right direction,” Phelps told NBC after his latest win.

“It’s a pretty cool feeling. I have had a great week so far, and we have one more race tomorrow,” he added, referring to his final Olympic race Saturday as part of the U.S. men’s 4X100-meter medley relay team.

Phelps wasn’t the only American to make history in the pool Friday. Missy Franklin, 17, from Pasadena, California, earned her third gold medal, and fourth medal overall, in the women’s 200-meter backstroke, smashing the world record in the process.

“It doesn’t get any better than this,” Franklin said to NBC about her victories in London. “This has been the most incredible week, and I’ve never been happier.”

Another American teenager, 15-year-old Katie Ledecky, also earned gold in impressive fashion, besting her nearest competitor by more than four seconds in the women’s 800-meter freestyle.

France’s Florent Manaudou, 21, won the swimming competition’s fastest and, arguably, most glamorous event with a time of 21.34 (just a shade off the Olympic record) in the men’s 50-meter freestyle, his first ever Olympic final.

The United States’ excellence at the Aquatics Centre helped them pass China for the most gold medals, with 21, on the seventh full day of the Games. The Americans have 43 medals total, compared with 42 for the Chinese.

AFTER THE COLORADO MASSACRE: WHY IS AMERICA SO ATTACHED TO GUNS?

What is it about Americans and guns?

How much time do you have?

“I can tell you that I don’t think there’s any other developed country in the world that has remotely the problem we have,” New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg said, after the shooting rampage in Colorado.

There are an estimated 270 million guns in the hands of civilians in the United States, making Americans the most heavily armed people in the world per capita. Yemen, a tribal nation with no history of strong central government or the rule of law, comes in a distant second.

From Washington, D.C., to the well-stocked shelves of Walmart stores nationwide, guns are regarded in the United States as a commonplace if controversial consumer item for millions of law-abiding hunters, collectors and citizens concerned about their safety. They are also in the hands of thousands of killers too; a Washington-based anti-gun lobby says those guns shoot more than 100,000 people a year. In 2010, there were more than 30,000 deaths caused by firearms when the number of homicides, suicides and accidental deaths are tallied.

America’s collective memory — of the Wild West in the 1800s, the assassinations of John F. Kennedy and Martin Luther King half a century ago and the front-page news from last week and is marked time and time again by guns.

“It’s undeniable,” writes Clayton Cramer, author of “Armed America: the Remarkable Story of How and Why Guns Became as American as Apple Pie.” “Guns are at the center of much of America’s history, its legends, and its horrors.”

There were guns in America long before the America we know today was even born. Early settlers in several states were required by law to own and maintain weapons as a matter of collective defense.

By the time the United States was established, its citizens had taken up arms not only against their Native American neighbors but the army of their own king. Their new constitution reflected that in its Bill of Rights, declaring that “A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.”

For more than two centuries that remained an important but largely overlooked guarantee, subjected to a modest series of controls. But in 2008 and 2010 landmark Supreme Court rulings gave that constitutional right sweeping new power, dramatically diminishing the authority of state and local governments to limit gun ownership.

Gun-friendly lawmakers have been active, too. Roughly half of the 50 U.S. states have adopted laws allowing gun owners to carry their guns openly in most public places. About as many states have ‘stand your ground’ laws that allow people to kill if they come under threat, even, in some cases, if they can escape the threat without violence.

The laws are being driven by politics and the politics are being driven by groups such as the National Rifle Association. Once a relatively modest organization of gun enthusiasts and hunters, it has become one of the most powerful political groups in the country. The Washington Post estimates that the NRA succeeded in helping elect four out of every five candidates it endorsed in the most recent congressional election.

In addition to that extraordinary impact in Congress, it has also been working to overturn gun-control laws in the courts as well.

The NRA and other gun-rights groups have allied themselves with the Republican Party and, especially, a sector of the American public suspicious of government intrusions into private life and often flatly hostile to Washington.

Read Dana Bash: For Democrats, gun politics are bad politics

“When they tell you that a government ban on certain firearms will somehow make you safer, don’t you believe it, not for a second, because it’s a lie just like the lies they’ve told you before,” NRA CEO Wayne LaPierre told a recent gathering of his members. “Their laws don’t work.”

“America stands alone in its historic and cultural attachment to guns. America stands armed.” Jonathan Mann

Poll results suggest most Americans wouldn’t agree. CNN and Gallup surveys going back years suggest that Americans are split between those who approve of current gun-control laws and respondents who would like to see them made more restrictive. Americans who’d like no controls at all are a small minority.

But even after the rampage in Colorado, American attitudes and laws aren’t likely to change much. Last year’s nearly fatal shooting of Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords didn’t move her state or federal colleagues to adopt any new gun control measures.

Both President Barack Obama and Republican challenger Mitt Romney issued statements in the hours after the Colorado shootings, and Sunday, Obama flew to the state to visit with shooting victims and their families. But neither proposed any changes to American attitudes toward guns.

“You know, soothing words are nice, but maybe it’s time that the two people who want to be president of the United States stand up and tell us what they are going to do about it, because this is obviously a problem across the country,” said New York’s Mayor Bloomberg, who is both a declared ‘independent’ politically and a vocal proponent of gun control.

America is not unique. Norwegians are marking the first anniversary of a shooting massacre that took the lives of 69 people at a summer camp outside of Oslo. Eight more people were that day killed by a bomb in the Norwegian capital itself. The confessed killer is awaiting the verdict of his trial.

But America seems to be the place the whole world thinks of when apparently ordinary people use guns for grotesque acts of violence. America stands alone in its historic and cultural attachment to guns. America stands armed.

From CNN.com

Posted by Ngo Okafor

THIS IS WHERE THE AIDS EPIDEMIC IS RUNNING RAMPANT IN THE US

Believe it or not, it has only been three decades since the first case of HIV was diagnosed. Since then, the number of cases in the U.S has exploded, aided in no small part by the fact that more than one out of five people with HIV don’t even know they have the disease. The situation is especially dire in the South, where half of new HIV infections in the country are reported even though the region accounts for only 37% of the population.

The infographic below illustrates just how bad the situation is. In Memphis, there is only one HIV specialist per 1,142 people diagnosed; in Arkansas, there aren’t any specialists at all.

“There are some key social determinants driving the epidemic that lead to the concentration of diagnoses that we’re seeing in the South,” explains Ronald Johnson, VP of public policy and advocacy for AIDS United, an organization that aims to end the HIV epidemic in the U.S.. “They include poverty and very limited access to care, healthcare infrastructure that has particular gaps in it, problems accessing HIV care, and the continuing impact of racism and discrimination that fuels the disproportionate impact that HIV has on African Americans and other racial and ethnic minorities.” Add to that the cultural conservatism in the area (read: homphobia and HIV discrimination), and we have ourselves a real problem.

AIDS United has a number of initiatives in the South to try to alleviate the problem, including a program in Alabama that offers hairstylists in training the opportunity to receive training that makes it easy for them to talk to clients about HIV protection; a telemedicine program to allow patients to receive counseling via phone; and a mobile HIV/AIDS care van in North Carolina.

It’s a start, but there is still plenty of work to be done.

THE ‘TODAY SHOW’ TO REPLACE ANN CURRY: DAMN YOU RATINGS!!!!

Here ‘Today,’ gone tomorrow! That is the story of Ann Curry’s career on the Today Show. Reports show that ‘Good Morning America’ has been kicking the Today Show’s ass in the ratings and in order to compete, Ann Curry has to get the axe. It won’t be easy to get rid of her though. She is not going out without a fight.
Read more….

The New York Times reports that  Curry, who replaced Meredith Vieira as co-anchor on NBC’s morning show “Today”  last year, is on her way out, with a decision coming as early as next week.

According to the Times, NBC executives are negotiating with Curry in an  effort to find a different position for her, possibly as a foreign  correspondent. The Times’ Brian Stelter writes that Curry, who is reluctant to  give up the position that she assumed a mere year ago, has hired attorney Robert  Barnett, who represented Christiane Amanpour during her exit from ABC News’  “This Week,” to represent her in the negotiations.

“She got her dream job, and she doesn’t want to let it go,” one source told  the Times.

The negotiations reportedly began several weeks ago.

A spokeswoman for NBC declined to comment.

Should ‘Today’ drop Ann Curry?

One source told the Times that the network is hoping to complete Curry’s  departure by the Summer Olympics, which kick off in July, so the network –  which is airing the Olympics — can move forward to the Games with a clean  slate.

“They feel real pressure to get it done by the Olympics,” the individual  said.

If NBC does decide to replace Curry on “Today,” concerns about waning ratings  could be at the heart of it. In April, “Good Morning America” beat “Today” in  total viewership for a full week, the first time that “GMA” could claim such a  victory in 16 years.

Posted by Ngo Okafor

The most downloaded black male model

Nigerian American black male model photo gallery and blog

www.getingo.com

NO JOKE!!! OBESITY COULD AFFECT 42% OF AMERICANS BY 2030

This is not a joke. USA Today posted this article today. Please take it seriously!!

“If nothing is done (about obesity), it’s going to hinder efforts for health care cost containment,” says  Justin Trogdon, a research economist with RTI International, a non-profit research organization in North Carolina’s Research Triangle Park.

 

As of 2010, about 36% of adults were obese, which is roughly 30 pounds over a healthy weight, and 6% were severely obese, which is 100 or more pounds over a healthy weight.

 

“The obesity problem is likely to get much worse without a major public health intervention,” says Eric Finkelstein, a health economist with Duke University Global Health Institute and lead researcher on the new study.

 

The analysis  was presented at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s “Weight of the Nation” meeting. The study is being published online in the American Journal of Preventive Medicine.

The increase in the obesity rate would mean 32 million more obese people within two decades, Finkelstein says. That’s on top of the almost 78 million people who were obese in 2010.

Extra weight takes a huge toll on health, increasing the risk of type 2 diabetes, heart disease, stroke, many types of cancer, sleep apnea and other debilitating and chronic illnesses.

“Obesity is one of the biggest contributors for why healthcare spending has been going up over the past 20 years,” says Kenneth Thorpe, a professor of health policy at Emory University in Atlanta.

The obesity rate was relatively stable in the USA between 1960 and 1980, when about 15% of people fell into the category. It increased dramatically in the ’80s and ’90s and was up to 32% in 2000 and 36% in 2010, according to CDC data. Obesity inched up slightly over the past decade,  which has caused speculation that the obesity rate might be leveling off.

Finkelstein, Trogdon and colleagues predicted future obesity rates with a statistical analysis using different CDC data, including body mass index, of several hundred thousand people. Body mass is a number that takes into account height and weight. Their estimates suggest obesity is likely to continue to increase, although not as fast as it has in the past.

Finkelstein says the estimates assume that things have gotten about as bad as they can get in the USA, in terms of an environment that promotes obesity. The country “is already saturated” with fast-food restaurants, cheap junk food and electronic technologies that render people sedentary at home and work,  he says. “We don’t expect the environment to get much worse than it is now, or at least we hope it doesn’t.”

In an earlier study, Finkelstein and experts from the CDC estimated that medical-related costs of obesity may be as high as $147 billion a year, or roughly 9% of medical expenditures. An obese person costs an average of $1,400 more in medical expenses a year than someone who is at a healthy weight, they found. Other researchers have estimated the costs may be even higher.

If the obesity rate stays at 2010 levels instead of rising to 42% as predicted, then the country could save more than $549.5 billion in weight-related medical expenditures between now and 2030, says study co-author Trogdon.

Patrick O’Neil,  president of the Obesity Society, a group of weight-control researchers and professionals, says that these new projections “indicate that even more people will be losing loved ones  and others will be suffering sickness and living lives that fall short of their promise because of obesity.”

There’s no one-size-fits all solution to a complex problem that has been decades in the making, says Sam Kass, assistant chef and senior policy advisor for Healthy Food Initiatives at the White House. “This national conversation — this national movement — must continue. This is literally life and death we are talking about.”

How can you lose weight and keep it off for good?

Successful dieters in the National Weight Control Registry, a group of 10,000 people who have lost 30 pounds or more and maintained that loss for a year or more, have developed many weight-control strategies. For instance, they:

•Follow a low-calorie, low-fat diet of about 1,800 calories a day.

•Keep track of food intake.

•Count calories, carbs or fat grams or use a commercial weight-loss program to track food intake.

•Walk about an hour a day or burn the same calories doing other physical activities.

•Eat breakfast regularly, often including whole grains and low-fat dairy products.

•Limit dining out to an average of three times a week, and fast food to less than once a week.

•Eat similar foods often and don’t splurge much.

•Watch fewer than 10 hours of TV a week.

•Weigh themselves at least once a week.